Comments on: Re: Fun With Math http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math Math Puzzles Keeps Your Mind Agile, Making Math Fun Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:53:14 +0000 hourly 1 By: Aprilshowersss http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1740 Aprilshowersss Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1740 <b>Very excellent ...</b> <br> Very excellent video! You are very very cool. ;) Very excellent …
Very excellent video! You are very very cool. ;)

]]> By: 12ytjljlcrf http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1741 12ytjljlcrf Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1741 <b>Just a complement: ...</b> <br> Just a complement: I saw a similar rule with 1, 3, 2 and -1, -3, -2. Kind of: ABCDEFG; 1G + 3F + 2E - 1D - 3C - 2B + 1A. Bobagem. Just a complement: …
Just a complement: I saw a similar rule with 1, 3, 2 and -1, -3, -2. Kind of: ABCDEFG; 1G + 3F + 2E – 1D – 3C – 2B + 1A. Bobagem.

]]> By: ashboxtoo http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1742 ashboxtoo Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1742 <b>Thanks man :)</b> <br> Thanks man :) Thanks man :)
Thanks man :)

]]> By: Prepoceros http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1743 Prepoceros Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1743 <b>Your pen ran out of ...</b> <br> Your pen ran out of ink? Well NO WONDER you didn't like my method. If you're going to *write it down*, why bother with all these tricks? Just do long division! And even if you did feel compelled to write out the steps, why copy all those numbers every time? That's just silly. Straw man! But I'm glad to see you're coming around to the rockitude of seven -- slowly but surely. I choose to ignore your mocking tone. SEVEN RULES AND YOU KNOW IT. Your pen ran out of …
Your pen ran out of ink? Well NO WONDER you didn’t like my method. If you’re going to *write it down*, why bother with all these tricks? Just do long division!

And even if you did feel compelled to write out the steps, why copy all those numbers every time? That’s just silly. Straw man!

But I’m glad to see you’re coming around to the rockitude of seven — slowly but surely. I choose to ignore your mocking tone. SEVEN RULES AND YOU KNOW IT.

]]> By: Prepoceros http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1744 Prepoceros Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1744 <b>I liked that one, ...</b> <br> I liked that one, too. I think the computations in mine are a little easier, but you're right that it's nice to have the remainder. I liked that one, …
I liked that one, too. I think the computations in mine are a little easier, but you’re right that it’s nice to have the remainder.

]]> By: websnarf http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1745 websnarf Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1745 <b>Uhh ... the ...</b> <br> Uhh ... the different primes work differently. To pull the same trick on 13 for example, you need to take the digits in groups of *6* and just add them together (no alternation) then you just have to find some way of dividing this result by 13. You can, of course, use the quadruple then add to previous digits rule to that smaller number. Uhh … the …
Uhh … the different primes work differently. To pull the same trick on 13 for example, you need to take the digits in groups of *6* and just add them together (no alternation) then you just have to find some way of dividing this result by 13. You can, of course, use the quadruple then add to previous digits rule to that smaller number.

]]> By: websnarf http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1746 websnarf Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1746 <b>1000 == -1 (mod 7). ...</b> <br> 1000 == -1 (mod 7). Nice. :) And this one retains the remainder intact as well. 1000 == -1 (mod 7). …
1000 == -1 (mod 7). Nice. :) And this one retains the remainder intact as well.

]]> By: PantySnatcher http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1747 PantySnatcher Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1747 <b>I wonder if anyone ...</b> <br> I wonder if anyone caught the vague reference to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, or maybe I'm wrong in uming that's what it was meant to be... neways, another great vid soup.... I wonder if anyone …
I wonder if anyone caught the vague reference to the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, or maybe I’m wrong in uming that’s what it was meant to be… neways, another great vid soup….

]]> By: 12ytjljlcrf http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1748 12ytjljlcrf Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1748 <b>'Soup, are you sure ...</b> <br> 'Soup, are you sure about that rule (with 1, 3, 2)? I don't know, it looks wrong (a different order; GFEDCBA)... By the way, I still vote for pleonasm. .. ‘Soup, are you sure …
‘Soup, are you sure about that rule (with 1, 3, 2)? I don’t know, it looks wrong (a different order; GFEDCBA)… By the way, I still vote for pleonasm. ..

]]> By: Billy7766 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math/comment-page-1#comment-1749 Billy7766 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:07 +0000 http://www.amusingmathpuzzles.com/math-is-fun/re-fun-with-math#comment-1749 <b>The title of this ...</b> <br> The title of this series IS an oxymoron, however it is useful. Enteraining and effective math would be a better title! The title of this …
The title of this series IS an oxymoron, however it is useful. Enteraining and effective math would be a better title!

]]>